Winter 2003 Newsletter

We select cattle to work for us, so we know they will work for you.

HARDINESS

                   “We have determined that the three most important factors in making                         a profit in ranching are cow fertility, cow longevity and not feeding hay.”

                                                                 Gregg Simonds Ensign Ranches                    Stockman GrassFarmer February 2003

Hardiness is a genetic trait that can only be measured through performance, that is by putting cattle into the environment in which they are expected to produce and then retaining those that are able to meet the production requirements of the breeder.  Those that fall short are culled.  According to Rick Bourdon and Bruce Golden of Colorado State University in an article entitled EPDs and Economics: Determining the Relative Importance of Traits, the traits in beef cattle production affecting profitability by categories were ranked as follows: 1. Survival; 2. Fertility/longevity; 3. Feed consumption; 4. Product; 5. Non-feed costs.

The first two categories of primary economic importance to cow-calf producers, survival and fertility/longevity, are a major part of all the traits that combine to define hardiness.  Additional characteristics of hardiness include an animal’s ability to cover rough country, readily convert limited or poor quality forage into beef and effectively handle environmental stress such as pests, disease, drought, heat, cold and blizzards.  In a minimum input range environment these traits are critical to profitability in commercial cow-calf operations. Even though this is true, these traits are often overlooked or ignored by many seed stock producers who give cows second chances or pamper their cattle to the point that they are able to reproduce.  I would expect if you were to take many of the current show ring winners of any breed and put them into harsh environments such as the short grass prairie of New Mexico, Florida swamps or Nevada desert without significant and costly supplementation, the cattle would not reproduce at economically acceptable levels.  Since hardiness is not easily measured, how can one select for it?  In the early 1940’s, Tom Lasater included hardiness on his short list of necessary characteristics that any beef animal must posses. He called them the Six Essentials.  Tom Lasater defined hardiness as an animal’s ability to carry on its production assignment year after year in a range environment with minimal assistance.  Beginning in 1948, every female on this ranch has been required to reach puberty and conceive in a short breeding season at 14-15 months of age, wean an acceptable calf and re-bred on schedule each year to remain in production.  This means hardiness has been bred into the cattle through natural selection.  

Hardiness is not as easily measured or quantified as growth traits or carcass traits, but to a rancher seeking to make a profit in a range environment it is economically essential and therefore needs to be focused on in a cattle-breeding program.  We invite you to come by the ranch and see for yourself a cowherd that has been selected in a range environment for hardiness since the 1940’s. 


 

WHAT DID THAT PREMIUM COST YOU?

If you spend any time at a cattleman’s meeting or at the auction barn you will hear cattle producers talking about premiums.  These conversations include premium specifications as well as the dollars granted above a general market price.  Premiums are given for everything from vaccination programs and hide color to breed and carcass traits.  The question many producers are asking is, “How can I capture that premium?”

 Unfortunately, a topic rarely discussed is the question, “What does that premium cost?”  Premiums are paid only by meeting a specific set of criteria.  Meeting the criteria always costs something.  Therefore, producers should be asking,  “What additional net income will this premium pay me?”  This is a difficult question because it requires an understanding of all the costs and variables involved with qualifying for the premium. 

 Someone once said, “It isn’t how much you make, it is how much you keep.”  Just because a premium was paid doesn’t mean it resulted in an increase in overall profit.  When the producer calculates all of the obvious and hidden costs involved in meeting the premium specifications, he may find that it actually cost him money.

 The following questions are important to ask when evaluating whether or not a premium will increase overall profits. 

  1. Will the changes the premium requires reduce my ability to match adapted genetics and calving date to the forage resources available?

 

  1. How will production costs per pound of calf produced compare before and after making the changes required to meet the premium?

 

  1. Will premium requirements restrict the opportunity to use genetic tools, such as crossbreeding, which can have a tremendous impact on ranch profitability?

For example, (see below) Rancher X and Rancher Y are neighbors running cow-calf operations. They retain replacement heifers and sell calves at weaning.   Who captures the market premium?  Who is more profitable?  Rancher X does receive more per pound for his calves, but Rancher Y, because of lower annual cow costs and a higher percent calf crop weaned per cow exposed, is more profitable.

Receiving premium prices is potentially one way to increase profits.  However, the overall effects of managing for a premium must be evaluated against all the costs.  Only through accurate evaluation will one be able to know if the additional dollars paid by the premium are resulting in a greater profit or a loss.

 

Annual

Calf Crop Weaned

Wn. Wt.

Price

Wn. Wt.

Price

Net Income

 

Breed

Cow Costs

Per Cow Exposed

Steers

Per lb.

Heifers

Per lb.

Per Cow

Rancher X

A

$370.00

82%

525

$0.98

485

$0.90

$43.68

Rancher Y

B

$335.00

86%

560

$0.88

520

$0.80

$64.87



 

Longevity in Bull Selection

We have long appreciated the old cows in our herd because they are the ones that could keep up a demanding production assignment year after year with no exceptions and no second chances.  Until several years ago, we did not have dam identification on calves from our mature herd, and therefore could not focus on the dam’s age of specific bulls.  Now that we identify calves with their dam’s number, we are in a position to let the  important trait of longevity impact our selection of bulls to be retained as sires in this herd.

 

First, lets review the history of our selection of yearling herd sires.  For many years we have focused on calves out of first calf heifers as we judged our yearling bulls to pick those that would be retained for use on this ranch.  We have always run the first calf heifers separately and at weaning every year, calves from those heifers are branded with a different number sequence so that they were permanently identified as such.  By contrast, all cows three years old and older have been run in one herd, and until six years ago, we did not have dam identification for the calves from our mature cowherd.  Until that time we did not know (in a herd with 225-250 males in a crop, a breeder typically would only remember a handful of the dams without records) whether a yearling bull we were selecting had a four-year-old dam or a twelve-year-old dam. 

 

We carefully study the bulls with two-year-old dams because a heifer that conceives and calves by her second birthday and raises an outstanding calf on par (without adjustment) with mature cows at their productive peak merits close scrutiny. 

 

Further, a two-year-old heifer is the “latest model” and if a herd is making genetic progress, then she should represent the superior genetics in the herd.  That is correct up to a point.  Certainly in the early years of this herd – the 1930’s, 40’s and 50’s –- progress was rapid and visible when weaning weights, for instance, were out in front of industry norms at that time.  That is no longer true.  Weaning weights in this herd have probably not changed in many years, other than the 75-100 pound yearly swings from climatic variations. 

Instead, progress for the past 20 years has been more a matter of refinement, of greater adaptability.  Because of course we are talking about a multi-trait selection program, where cattle must excel in a series of traits, not just weight which is both the easiest trait to measure and the easiest one to over-emphasize.

 

Lets get back to bulls out of first calf heifers.  Only within the last few years did we decide to no longer keep for our own use a bull whose two-year-old dam did not re-breed on schedule for her second calf.  We made that change after being convinced by the persuasive arguments of a visitor from Australia. Why should we continue returning to the herd the genetics of a one-shot wonder, a heifer that does a wonderful job with her first calf, but then falls out of the herd?  Because we are not just selecting for weight (which at weaning reflects primarily milk production): we also want fertility and hardiness among other traits.  It is longevity which best measures hardiness and which reflects a cow’s success in a achieving that delicate balance between antagonistic traits.

 

In 2002, for the first time ever, prior to beginning our selection of yearling herd sires, we made a three-way sort: in one pen, the progeny of two and three-year-olds (a difficult time of life for cows entering the herd), in a second, the progeny from four to seven-year-olds (cows in the prime of life) and in a third, the progeny from eight to fifteen-year-olds (the survivors).   The result was not expected.  As we have continued to think about and focus on longevity during the past several years and as that condition has assumed a great role as an indicator – of balance between various traits – we thought that we might have to make allowances in order to give full credit to the calves with eight-year-old and older dams.  It was in fact quite the contrary.  When looking at the three pens of yearling bulls, all those involved with the bull selection unanimously agreed that one pen jumped out above the other in terms of overall quality – the pen of progeny from eight-year-old and older dams was superior to the other two.

 

 

Summary of 2002 Lasater Beefmaster Herd Sire Selection

 

  • Weights are not adjusted for days of age or age of dams

  • Heaviest yearling weight was from an eight-year-old dam

  • Eight to twelve-year-old dams’ bull calves weaned within 20 lbs. of four to seven-year-old dams’ bull calves

  • Thirteen of the fifteen bulls kept were born in first three weeks of the calving period (The other two came one week later.)

  • All fifteen bulls were born within 26 days of (283 day gestation) book date for start of calving season

  • Average weights of the bulls from the three groups of dams varied 47 lbs. at weaning and 27 lbs. as yearlings

 

BULLS OUT OF TWO & THREE-YEAR-OLD DAMS

 

BRAND

BIRTH

 

5/13/02

 

8/20/02

 

SIRE

DAM

DAM

NO.

DATE

COLOR

WEAN WT.

GAIN

WT.

S.C.

NO.

NO.

AGE

1065

8/15

LR

585

251

836

36.5

Multi

9706

2

1207

8/1

RMF

639

270

909

30

9627

9527

2

1326

7/26

R Bri

648

246

894

32.5

8351

8312

3

AVERAGE

624

256

879

33

OUT OF FOUR TO SEVEN-YEAR-OLD DAMS

BRAND

BIRTH

 

5/13/02

 

8/20/02

 

SIRE

DAM

DAM

NO.

DATE

COLOR

WEAN WT.

GAIN

WT.

S.C.

NO.

NO.

AGE

1305

7/20

R

707

199

906

34

8302

7635

4

1306

7/26

Bri

634

227

861

31

7532

6730

5

1526

8/2

R

678

213

891

32.5

7532

7019

4

1537

7/26

LR

672

234

906

33

8302

6302

5

1592

8/4

R

665

212

877

33.5

7256

4103

7

AVERAGE

671

217

888

33

OUT OF EIGHT TO TWELVE-YEAR-OLD DAMS

BRAND

BIRTH

 

5/13/02

 

8/20/02

 

SIRE

DAM

DAM

NO.

DATE

COLOR

WEAN WT.

GAIN

WT.

S.C.

NO.

NO.

AGE

1302

7/24

LR

647

217

864

34

8316

2679

9

1309

8/5

R

667

170

837

33

7256

0619

11

1392

7/14

R

684

229

913

30.5

7256

3062

8

1572

8/1

R

672

199

871

32

7256

0617

11

1673

8/8

LRD

582

228

810

31

7615

(89)9721

12

1695

7/26

R*

647

212

859

31

7256

1563

10

1860

8/15

DR

642

234

876

31

7615

2351

9

AVERAGE

649

213

861

32

AVERAGE ON 38 2'S

583

220

803

30.5

AVERAGE ON 105 3'S

614

210

823

30.5

Sons of Lasater 6129 continue to perform and be well accepted by commercial cattlemen and Beefmaster breeders.  Eight sons of Lasater 6129 averaged $2,850 in this year’s production sale.  Lasater 6129 was also the sire of the high selling bull in this year’s sale.  Currently, two sons of Lasater 6129 are at work in our herd.  All of this adds up to consistent performance from a seasoned herd sire.  Lasater 6129 is currently owned by Vista Livestock of Denair, California.

Sire: Lasater 4396             Dam:  Lasater 4079

WWT 673  YWT 894  WWR 108  YWR 107    

Mature Wt. 2075#

 

Contact Us