|
Numbers are important tools in any
cattle breeding program, and every seedstock producer needs to generate
and compare a variety of numbers that measure a particular animal’s
traits as well as ones that quantify overall herd production.
But numbers are only important in
context, and in any attempt to compare cattle, the context- the rest of
the story-is critical. No judgment can be rendered on an animal’s merit
without a complete understanding of both the management and selection
program in the herd that produced the animal as well as the environment
(including supplementation) in which the individual’s dam and other
forbears were expected to produce.
Weight is the easiest number to get and
is potentially the most misused in selecting breeding stock. Since it is
so easy to weigh an animal, and we have many weights on each one, it
often dominates the statistical data and we almost unavoidably
over-emphasize that trait in our breeding decisions. Weaning and
yearling weights are meaningful only when one knows the details of the
conditions that produced that weight (such as the level of
supplementation before and after weaning) as well as the production
requirements put on the females in that herd.
How useful is the weight record of a
bull whose dam had her first calf at three years of age, or who is
nursing her fourth calf at seven? How helpful the outstanding yearling
weight EPD of a bull whose dam had to be assisted in delivering him, or
who had to be milked out for him to nurse?
|
Why are we concerned
with the possible over-emphasis of weight? Because it is only one of six
traits essential for profitable beef production, and because the average
Beefmaster cow is plenty big already. Plenty big, that is, to be a
functional mama paying her way on pastureland anywhere in the U.S.
Weaning weights at 8-9 months averaging
550-625# (available to anyone using good bulls) are as heavy as we are
going to get in this country. Of course a few calves may be much
heavier. That is good as long as their mothers breed back on schedule,
are able to keep up the pace year after year, and don’t require a lot of
extra feed expense to achieve those weights. Which means that a breeding
cow’s longevity is a very important factor to include in any comparison
of the numbers on individual animals. Longevity is probably the best
single indicator that the various essential traits are in balance, and
insures that we are not using the numbers to push any trait too far.
The management
practices and the long-term selection program in place for any herd
provide the critical under-pining for the
performance records generated. We would
assert that unless you know those details about a particular farm or
ranch, numbers are virtually meaningless. The breeding program
established in the 1930’s and 1940’s which gave rise to the Beefmaster
breed still forces a compromise between antagonistic traits such as
weight and hardiness, and insures that these cattle are masters at
converting forages to beef while producing pounds at a profit.
|